Maurice Crommie's E-mail and Attached Letters to What Now?!

Editor's note: Below are the June 26, 2003, e-mail Maurice Crommie sent to What Now?! togehther with his two letters addressed to Bill Ahern, one dated May 15, 2003, and the other May 29, 2003.

From: <mcrommie@olemis.edu>
To: <saigobe@lanset.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Ahern letters

Dear Sir,

Attached are copies of two letters I recently mailed to the newly appointed CPUC Executive Director, Dr. William Ahern.

My first letter, on May 15, 2003, asks for Dr. Ahern's help to correct an injustice perpetrated on me by a former Chief Counsel of the CPUC, Mr. Peter Arth, during the time when Dr. Ahern was Director of the Public Staff Division of the CPUC. Dr. Ahern answered my request by scrawling an indignant reply on the bottom of my letter(copy attached).

My second letter, on May 29, 2003, is my response to Dr. Ahern's unprofessional indignant reply. It is exceedingly unbecoming for a high Public Official in an important position such as the one occupied by Dr. Ahern to act and reply to a legitimate request in such a childish manner out of pique.

The subject matter in question is extremely important to me. Dr. Ahern is personally acquainted with the details of my discrimination suit against the CPUC, which I won in 1993. Although I won a discrimination damage award of close to $200,000 during the trial, Mr. Peter Arth, the CPUC Chief Counsel during the trial, squandered more than $10,000,000 of State and CPUC funds by his inept handling of my complaint. Subsequent to the trial, Mr. Arth, with the help of the CPUC Personnel Department, illegally arranged a reduction in my retirement pay.

I complained bitterly to several State Agencies, including CalPERS, CSEA, DPA, the Attorney General's Office, the Governor's Office and the State Auditor, but I was constantly referred back to the CPUC as the only agency that could correct the illegal reduction, vindictively made by Mr. Peter Arth to reduce my retirement pension.

When Dr. Ahern was reappointed as top Executive Director of the CPUC after a ten year absence, I thought I could appeal to him to direct the CPUC Personnel Department to correct the illegal vindictive order given to them by the former inept Chief Counsel, Mr. Peter Arth. Dr. Ahern's reply to my request, however, was disappointing and unprofessional as shown above.

In his new position as Executive Director, Dr. Ahern has the authority to correct the past injustice of a former Chief Counsel by simply ordering the CPUC Personnel Department to disregard the illegal instructions of the former inept Counselor and correct the record of my promotion to PURA V. I have been assured by the Office of CalPERS that disseminates retiree paychecks that this would be sufficient for them to make the correct adjustment to my retirement pension.

Dr. Ahern, however, chooses to be as vindictive as former Chief Counsel, Mr. Peter Arth, in denying me my correct pension in retribution for my having defeated both of them in a fair court trial, which ultimately cost the CPUC over $10,000,000 due to Mr. Arth's ineptness. My lawyers fees alone were over $2,000,000. Other court costs and out of court settlements of individual and class action discrimination suits related to mine, and inspired by my victory, added several more millions of dollars to CPUC trial costs. Mr. Arth should have been fired for his total ineptness in conducting a settlement to my complaint. Instead, however, he was rewarded for reducing my pension by a small amount, less than 1% of what he ineptly squandered on the direct and related costs of the trial.

Dr. Ahern left the CPUC shortly after my trial. He was gone for ten years until his recent appointment as Executive Director. There are few punishments for offending and disreputable high ranking Public Officials.

The accompanying plaintiff in my trial, Mr. Arthur Mangold, received his correct pension pay for his court ordered promotion during my trial. I was the only one denied, since I was the chief architect of mine and related discrimination suits. I bore the brunt of CPUC directed venom.

Yours truly,

Maurice F. Crommie, former CPUC analyst

Maurice Crommie's May 15, 2003, letter to Bill Ahern

Maurice F. Crommie
P.O. Box 1514
Oxford, MS 38655

May 15, 2003

Dr. Bill Ahern
Executive Director
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Dear Dr. Ahern,

Congratulations on your recent appointment to Executive Director of the CPUC.

Enclosed is a copy of a letter that I have just mailed to Gary Cohen, your Chief Counsel.

I believe you already know most of the details of my dispute with Peter Arth, who was Chief Counsel during my discrimination suit against the CPUC. Arth acted vindictively and gloated to his staff on your in-house internet in denying me my correct pension. He also cost the CPUC millions of dollars through his stupidity and inability to handle what could have been a simple problem.

I believe that someone in your position can correct the injustice I have suffered due to Arth’s vindictiveness.

Please let me know if you can.

Yours truly,

Maurice F. Crommie

Maurice Crommie's May 29, 2003, letter to Bill Ahern

Maurice F. Crommie
P.O. Box 1514
Oxford, MS 38655

May 29, 2003

Dr. William Ahern
Executive Director
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102

Dear Dr. Ahern,

You are misinformed about me.

I never compared you to Hitler or Mussolini. That is a moronic and sophomoric comparison and I am neither.

The letter of May 15th that you returned to me on May 27th is the first letter I ever wrote to you. I was looking for help. I thought you could help me. I would not have sent it if I had known the degree of misinformation and resentment you harbor against me.

True, we were on opposite sides in a CPUC discrimination suit. I won the case because we proved discrimination exists at the CPUC. How much blame was assessed on you depends on what was presented during the trial and what the jury believed. I believe the evaluation of your stewardship at the CPUC was only one element of the trial. You know whether or not discrimination exists at the CPUC.

Contrary to your misinformed opinion of my defamation of your character, I have on several occasions defended your character and obvious abilities during colloquies with other CPUC staff employees. This does not mean that I do not hold any negative opinions about your stewardship at the CPUC. I do. They are not as moronic or sophomoric, however, as you portrayed in your response to my letter. Sleep easy, you are not comparable to either Hitler or Mussolini.

This is my last correspondence to you, unless you inform me otherwise.

Yours truly,

Maurice F. Crommie