| |
From:
Greene, Vibert
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:19 PM
To: Larson, Stephen; Peevey, Michael R.
Cc: Young, Karen; Sanchez, Danilo E.; Appling,
Dana; Smith, Richard; Carazo, George A.; Hopper, Cathleen; Effross,
David; Fanusie, Yaya
Subject:
Hello Steve,
It’s a step in the right direction to improve the morale
at the Commission. However, I think you are putting the cart
before the horse—it is an establish fact that the reason
for low morale and low productivity at the Commission are due
mainly to poor management--this includes the supervisors and
the managers--practices.
The focus of your training memo/efforts is directed towards
the employees—you are saying they are the problem—that
if they have more training they will do a better job. The real
problem is not the employees it’s management. They are
the ones that should be given serious training. Also the selective
process this Commission uses to promote/select managers and
supervisors is seriously flawed—it is based on the good
old boys/gals club. And anyone who does not belong to that club
and do not rubber stamp management wants and wishes gets sidelined,
marginalized and ridiculed. They are called “disgruntled”
and or “not a team player”.
I have seen training seminars on the bulleting board for supervisors
etc. However, it is the type of training and selection process
for managers that need to be address first. Then, you can consider
training, as appropriate, for the employees.
You said you want an honest input—well here it is.
|
|
| |
|
|