|
Are State
agencies being used as payroll surrogates and holding places for
campaigners and consultants of politicians?
Editor’s Note: The LWDA has the
following agencies under its jurisdiction: a) Agricultural Labor
Relations Board; b) California Workforce Investment Board; c) Department
of Industrial Relations; d) Employment Development Department
About a year ago Governor Gray Davis appointed
Stephen Smith, the former Director of the Department of Industrial
Relations (DIR), as Acting Secretary of the then newly-created Labor
and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA). It should be noted that
Mr. Smith, who has worked for many years as a campaigner for Gray
Davis, had been appointed as Director of DIR also by Davis.
About
three months ago Mr. Smith took a leave of absence from his position
as Acting Secretary of LWDA in order to help in the Gray Davis’
anti-recall campaign.
One
would think that the position of an Agency Secretary is important
and that the high remuneration of the position signifies that the
person entrusted with the position has to perform vital functions.
If that is the case, then the recruitment of Mr. Smith for the governor’s
anti-recall campaign is going to hurt LWDA. If that is not the case,
then this means that Mr. Smith doesn’t offer valuable contribution
to LWDA, in which case he should have not been appointed there in
the first place.
It
is very likely that Mr. Smith’s skills are more suited for
running political campaigns than running an agency. In that case
his leave of absence from LWDA should be rescinded and Mr. Smith
should decide: he can either resume his duties as Acting Secretary
of the agency or he should resign and help the governor in his campaign.
What
is not acceptable is for the politicians to use the State agencies
as holding places for their campaigners and other staff between
elections and political campaigns at the expense of the taxpayers.
|